chess 3d its a draw
3d Chess Game a Draw Afterward Early Fireworks
See the article in its original context from
October 17, 1990
,
Section B , Page
2Buy Reprints
TimesMachine is an exclusive do good for habitation delivery and digital subscribers.
Near the Archive
This is a digitized version of an article from The Times'southward print archive, before the outset of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles equally they originally appeared, The Times does non alter, edit or update them.
Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other issues; nosotros are standing to work to amend these archived versions.
Anatoly Karpov and Gary Kasparov struggled through 13 moves of a thorny, problem-ridden endgame to a draw last nighttime in the third game of their World Championship Chess Lucifer in Manhattan.
The score now stands at Kasparov 2, Karpov ane.
For Kasparov, information technology was a distressing comedown from the previous evening. The titleholder had been cruising with the advantage of a bishop plus ii pawns for the challenger's rook, but he made an fault at the 35th move, lost a pawn, and despite his straining to win last night, Karpov held him at bay.
When play resumed in the adjournment session concluding night, Karpov soon surprised everyone by following a path believed faulty.
The most indefatigable kibitzer in this contest, I.B.Thousand.'s Deep Thought, the strongest chess-playing computer in the globe, unearthed a manner for Karpov to win a pawn that would very probable have been decisive in Game i, and D. T. worked on through Mon night, analyzing the secrets of the adjourned position.
Karpov and Deep Idea Differ
Deep Thought put its chips on the line in claiming that the rightful effect of the game should be a draw. Information technology broached 41 . . . Kd6 42 Rc8 e2 43 Be2 fg 44 hg Bf5 45 Rc4 Bh3 46 Kf2 Be6 47 Bf1 Bc4 48 bc returning the reward of rook for bishop to obtain a repose, level position. Almost all the grandmasters agreed. But Karpov found some other intriguing manner to salvage the depict, using the 42 Ra5 that everyone had rejected.
After 49 . . . g4, Karpov avoided the trap 50 Ne5? gf 51 Ng6 Nd1! 51 Ra1 Ne3! 52 Kg1 f2 53 Kh1 g2 54 Kh2 f1/Q.
Afterwards 52 . . . g2 he could non play 53 Kg2 because of 53 . . . Be4. Moreover, 53 Ra1? g1/Q 54 Rg1 Ng1 55 Kg2 Bc2 56 Kg1 Bb3 gives Black winning chances in the two-bishops-versus-knight ending. On the other mitt, his 53 Rd8!, planning 53 . . . Kd8 54 Kg2, was quite safe considering bishop and knight pose no serious threat to king and knight. The players agreed to the draw at in one case.
Swashbuckling early on play by Kasparov featuring the sacrifice of of his queen, the most powerful piece on the board, led to a state of affairs where his lesser bishops and knights tormented the hapless challenger, driving him back into a disorganized mess. The ultimate purpose was the purely positional 1 of controlling all the vital squares, and information technology succeeded brutally.
Kasparov's Stunning Gamble
For his 2nd plough every bit Black, Kasparov again chose the King's Indian Defense, which many players doubtable because of its conceding White an advantage in terrain right from the beginning. But information technology does create a field twenty-four hours for cunning, convoluted play and that is what the champion revels in.
He dumbfounded everyone for the second game in a row by offering a sacrifice of a rook for a bishop and a pawn with 9 . . . Qd8!? ''I don't do such things,'' said the Stamford, Conn., grandmaster Sergey Kudrin, sneering at Kasparov's advised souvenir. And Joel Lautier, at 17 years sometime the world'due south youngest grandmaster, frowned and slowly and seriously said, ''No, nor would I.''
But the older generation, represented by the lxxx-year-onetime Argentine grandmaster, Miguel Najdorf, took a more than youthful view: ''Black is better. He has the dynamic possiblities. Or at least, he is non worse.''
Subsequently 15 . . . Ne6 young Lautier changed his listen and judged that Kasparov'south gamble made good sense. Other grandmasters, like Maxim Dlugy and Boris Gulko of the Usa and Aleksei Suetin of the Soviet Union, before long joined the bandwagon.
It takes 12 i/2 points to win the match. Each victory is worth ane betoken, and a describe, a half-betoken.
The previous rule that six victories would likewise determine the champion has been dropped because that could feasibly deprive the co-sponsor, the metropolis of Lyons, France, of a fair part of the friction match. Thus, if, later 10 games, ane player has 6 points, or if, after eleven games, i player has 6 i/ii points, the New York segment of the contest will end and the Lyons segment will begin.
Game four is scheduled for today at 5:30 P.Thou. at the Hotel Macklowe.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/17/nyregion/3d-chess-game-a-draw-after-early-fireworks.html
0 Response to "chess 3d its a draw"
Post a Comment